@article {1271, title = {The impact of PEPFAR transition on HIV service delivery at health facilities in Uganda.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {14}, year = {2019}, month = {2019}, pages = {e0223426}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Since 2004, the President{\textquoteright}s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has played a large role in Uganda{\textquoteright}s HIV/AIDS response. To better target resources to high burden regions and facilities, PEPFAR planned to withdraw from 29\% of previously-supported health facilities in Uganda between 2015 and 2017.

METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 226 PEPFAR-supported health facilities in Uganda in mid-2017. The survey gathered information on availability, perceived quality, and access to HIV services before and after transition. We compare responses for facilities transitioned to those maintained on PEPFAR, accounting for survey design. We also extracted data from DHIS2 for the period October 2013-December 2017 on the number of HIV tests and counseling (HTC), number of patients on antiretroviral therapy (Current on ART), and retention on first-line ART (Retention) at 12 months. Using mixed effect models, we compare trends in service volume around the transition period.

RESULTS: There were 206 facilities that reported transition and 20 that reported maintenance on PEPFAR. Some facilities reporting transition may have been in a gap between implementing partners. The median transition date was September 2016, nine months prior to the survey. Transition facilities were more likely to discontinue HIV outreach following transition (51.6\% vs. 1.4\%, p<0.001) and to report declines in HIV care access (43.5\% vs. 3.1\%, p<0.001) and quality (35.6\% vs. 0\%, p<0.001). However, transition facilities did not differ in their trends in HIV service volume relative to maintenance facilities.

CONCLUSIONS: Transition from PEPFAR resulted in facilities reporting worsening patient access and service quality for HIV care, but there is insufficient evidence to suggest negative impacts on volume of HIV services. Facility respondents{\textquoteright} perceptions about access and quality may be overly pessimistic, or they may signal forthcoming impacts. Unrelated to transition, declining retention on ART in Uganda is a cause for concern.

}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0223426}, author = {Wilhelm, Jess Alan and Qiu, Mary and Paina, Ligia and Colantuoni, Elizabeth and Mukuru, Moses and Ssengooba, Freddie and Bennett, Sara} }